Fran Hudson
October 1, 2014
October 1, 2014
Alexander "the Great" Research Project
Does Alexander
deserve to be called great?
Alexander does not deserve to be
called "great" because he was a very poor leader. Alexander was
defined as great for what he did in only a thirteen year period, 336 B.C. through 323 B.C. When he was only twenty years old, he became Macedonia's new military commander and king
when his father, King Phillip II, was assassinated at Alexander’s sister’s
wedding. Alexander was a cruel dictator, not a great king. He had a belligerent
personality and always wanted complete control over all his people. He murdered
anyone, including his friends and advisors, who objected to his ideas or just
made him mad. According to The Independent, Alexander spent most
of his life, including his childhood, drinking alcohol. The article claims Alexander was insecure due to his father’s sarcastic and unpredictable personality
and that alcoholism was the cause of his death, not fever. When Alexander was drunk one night, he killed his friend, Cleitus, who once saved his life in
battle. Alexander
was self-centered and thought very highly of himself naming almost all of his cities after himself. Perhaps because his mother,
Olympias, told Alexander he was the son of the god Zeus instead of Phillip. Alexander bullied his
army into marching and conquering more and more territory for eleven years. When
they finally refused to go any further, at the Hyphasis River, Alexander immaturely
sulked for two days. According to Mr. Giotto's Site, on the way back to Babylon, Alexander selfishly took a deadly path
that killed a majority of his men who many haven’t seen their families in over
a decade. Not only did Alexander have terrible leadership qualities as the
military commander, he never was a true king for his people back at home. After only two years of being king, he left
with the military showing no signs of coming back. He left most of his responsibilities as king with
Antipater, Macedon's guardian. People gave Alexander his epithet for being a great conqueror, but
he wasn't a good leader and was responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths
of his own men.
What can one learn
about the values of society based on their views on greatness?
People’s
views on greatness depend on what their values are. Macedonians didn't value
literature or architecture like the Greeks. They valued fearlessness and power.
These values were why Macedonia viewed their kings as great. Their kings used clever
tactics in battle, like the Phalanx formation, and were bold and courageous. People
viewed King Alexander III as great before he was even king because he made great
accomplishments at a very young age. Society was first impressed by Alexander
when he was eight and had tamed a wild horse that even his father’s grooms
couldn't tame. Young Alexander also had opportunities that typical children
didn't have such as being educated by the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, and
learning to command troops. On the contrary to Macedon, Greek societies valued beauty in architecture and literature. Examples of these values are the Parthenon temple and Euclid’s, The Elements. Egyptians viewed Alexander as great during the
Hellenistic Period because he founded the city Alexandria which contained
valuable resources such as a trading port, the Alexandrian Library, and
a culture center. Greatness can be viewed in many ways, but societies’ values will tell what they think is true greatness.
Do time and distance
impact someone's popular perception?
Yes, time and distance does impact
someone’s popular perception. Time and distance gives opportunities to reflect
on historical events and what happened or historical people and their actions. “The
life of Alexander the Great has inspired people from antiquity to modern
times.” People’s perceptions of Alexander the Great have definitely changed
over time. Alexander’s army didn't want to keep marching and conquering more
territory when Alexander was pushing them keep going. His army could only
travel by foot and use weaponry such as spears and shields. His military and citizens
viewed Alexander as a bully and cruel. Today, more people view Alexander as an
accomplished and successful military commander. Alexander conquered and expanded his empire 3,000 miles without the help from modern technology, like tanks and
guns. This is impressive for modern civilizations that have modern technology. One
example of a person whose popular perception has been impacted by time and
distance is Nelson Mandela. When Mandela was imprisoned for fighting against
apartheid in South Africa, people viewed him as rebellious and crazy. Over
time, Mandela gained supporters from all over the world for his cause to resist
apartheid. When he was released from jail, 28 years later, people viewed him as
courageous and powerful. These examples prove that time and distance impact popular perception because using time to see different viewpoints does
change how people think about greatness.
Works Cited
"Alexander the Great." ABC CLio Solutions. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. ABC-CLIO eBook Collection. Web. 22 Sept. 2014.
<http://ancienthistory.abc-clio.com/Search/Display/575648?terms=Ancient%20Cities%20during%20Alexander%20the%20great&webSiteCode=SLN_HANC&returnToPage=%2fSearch%2fDisplay%2f575648%3fterms%3dAncient+Cities+during+Alexander+the+great&token=AA58ACBAB26B27B1F694A804483D2ADB&casError=False>.
"Alexander the Great." Ancient Civilizations. UShistory.org, n.d. Web. 21 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.ushistory.org/civ/5g.asp>.
"Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age." Mr. Giotto's Site. SchoolWorld, n.d.
Web. 21 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.penfield.edu/webpages/jgiotto/onlinetextbook.cfm?subpage=1653418>.
Beck, Roger B. World
History: Patterns of Interaction. N.p.: Houghton Mifflin School, 2006.
Print.
Brophy, James M. Perspectives
From the Past. 5th ed. N.p.: Norton and Company Inc., 2011. Print.
Denison, Simon. "Was Alexander a great alcoholic?" The Independent. N.p., 2 Aug. 1992. Web.
29 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/was-alexander-a-great-alcoholic-1537664.html>.
Green, Peter. Alexander of
Macedon 356-323 B.C.:A Historical Biography. New York: University of
California Press, 1992. Print.
"Nelson Mandela." World
History: A Modern Era. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. ABC-CLIO eBook Collection. Web. 25 Sept. 2014.
<http://worldhistory.abc-clio.com/Search/Display/315233?terms=Nelson+Mandela>.
Worthington, Ian. "How 'Great' Was Alexander?" The Ancient History Bulletin. N.p., n.d.
Web. 24 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.utexas.edu/courses/citylife/readings/great1.html>.
This was really interesting to read-- I liked that you mentioned Alexander killing one of his close friends, it made more of an impact than if you had just said he killed a bunch of random people.
ReplyDeleteYour blog entry was very in depth and really let the reader know your views about Alexander the Great or Alexander the not so Great. I really liked how at the beginning of your entry you listed a lot of background information about Alexander, his family, and his friends. You talked about his life and him, and really gave a lot of reasoning to believe that Alexander was not Great. You supported you answering very well and really made the reader think and agree with what you believe about Alexander.
ReplyDeleteI liked how you gave me hard evidence about how he was not great in your oppinion. The fact that he was an alchoholic really set the tone on who you thought he was and made me think about him a little differently
ReplyDeleteThis was a great post, i like how you mentioned all the little details on why he shouldn't be called "great" like the statement about how he was called great in only the thirteen years of his time! Your statement about the deaths of his own men made me think around my opinion on why he was great! I also liked your person you used and how you explained all the details about Nelson Mandela!
ReplyDeleteWow, I really enjoyed reading this! I love how you compared Alexander to Nelson Mandela. What made you consider comparing Alexander to someone good when you yourself consider Alexander to be bad?
ReplyDeleteFran, I loved how you gave your thoughts and answers to the questions at the beginning of each paragraph and then you backed it up with all your imformation and facts. That is how a paragraph should be done. You got right down to the point, and then you gave enough examples to persuade the reader in your favor
ReplyDeleteI like for your second question that you brought up that greatness cannot be measured by military prowess, and there are different ways see that someone is great.
ReplyDeleteHey Eve. I chose to compare Nelson Mandela to Alexander the Great because I felt like both people's perceptions have changed majorly.
ReplyDelete