Is Alexander Great? Alexander is Great. He was an amazing general, leader, and politician. To understand Alexander's greatness we must consider unique circumstances he grew and thrived under. He was a taught by none other than Aristotle on the fine arts such as reading, writing, and arithmetic. He was taught in the art of war by his father, who had conquered Greece. By age sixteen Alexander the Great already played a major in the battle at Chaeronea. (World Military Leaders p 12) After his father was assassinated, Alexander the Great went on to destroy Persia and conquer the eastern Mediterranean sea board. He then conquered a large part of know Asia. This progress was only hindered by three things;
1. was a mutiny at Asia's eastern frontier
2. a mutiny was caused by the integration of Asian troops into Alexander's army
3. he lost a large number of men in the Makran dessert.
In spite of all this Alexander never was defeated.
Map of Alexanders Conquests
1. was a mutiny at Asia's eastern frontier
2. a mutiny was caused by the integration of Asian troops into Alexander's army
3. he lost a large number of men in the Makran dessert.
In spite of all this Alexander never was defeated.
Map of Alexanders Conquests
What can one learn about society from its definition of greatness? Greatness is the ability to rise above the average person, it is to be the best at something, and in some cases it is to be the best at everything. In the case Alexander the Great he was the best warrior, diplomat, and king. He fought for thirteen years and was not defeated once. He treated the leaders and soldiers he captured with mercy. He even bowed down to other peoples gods to please the religious leaders. In Napoleon's case he was the greatest french general to ever live. He was an amazing king, and a tenacious leader. He captured all of Europe, parts of Africa, and even when he was forced to give up his crown his people still loved him. Society is easily able to admit the greatness of Alexander the Great and Napoleon. Societies view of greatness is not always fair though. Hitler is, by society's definition great, he conquered all of Europe. He rebuilt Germany from the ground up, and rebooted the worlds economy; yet he is remembered as the one the world worst tyrants.
Can time and distance change a persons reputation? It can but not always for the best outcome. In the case of Julius Caesar's was a tyrant and a murderer. but we are taught that he was a great leader since he implemented a few of the ideas we use in the American government. Though he was actually a tyrant he is remembered, wrongfully, as a great leader. There are also some cases in which the outcome is good. In Alexanders case he was a leader, he cared for his people, and he was a political genius and military genius. He was a true man by the definition of Macedonians. He entertained the Persian diplomats and conversed at or above their level of thinking at age seventeen. He was and still is considered a great leader to day as he rightfully should be.
Citations: "Alexander the Great." Book/encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World. N.p.: n.p., 2005. 14-18. Print.
Sienkewicz, Thomas J. "Alexander the Great." Encyclopedia of the Ancient World. Pasadena, CA: Salem, 2002. 228-29. Print.
Grossman, Mark. "Alexander the Great." N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.
"Alexander the Great." Military Commanders:. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Sept. 2014.
"Napoleon Bonaparte." Napoleon Bonaparte. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Sept. 2014.
"Alexander the Great." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 29 Sept. 2014.
"Julius Caesar." Julius Caesar. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Sept. 2014.
"Economy of Nazi Germany." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 29 Sept. 2014. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
"The Internet Classics Archive | Alexander by Plutarch." The Internet Classics Archive | Alexander by Plutarch. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Sept. 2014.
"King Philip II - Alexander The Great - Father of Alexander - Husband of Olympias - Phillip." King Philip II - Alexander The Great - Father of Alexander - Husband of Olympias - Phillip. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Do time and distance change the perspective on everyone or just some people?
ReplyDeleteI like how in question 1 you gave examples but it would help the reader if you just expanded on the examples a little bit.
In question 2 I liked that you talked about greatness but I am confused on how we view a country by there greatness. Overall I think you did well on telling how Alexander was great and relating the questions to other people or places, Good Job!
I agree with your ideas, and I think your comparison to Hitler was great. At the time he might have been considered good for boosting Germany's economy and turning them into a political super power, but we frown upon him today for what he did to make this super power.
ReplyDeletehow was he a great leader and politician? Maybe and example or more elaboration on the idea would make it clearer
ReplyDeleteI like how yours is concise. Simple yet effective! I also like how you just dove into the blog and your comparison to ceaser
ReplyDeleteHey Henley. I really liked how you defined what you thought greatness was before explaining why Alexander was great. This made your argument easier to agree with. I think comparing two historical figures was a clever idea as well.
ReplyDeleteEven though he conquered many people he was very diplomatic and treated his prisoners more like they were under house arrest then in prison. He was a great leader because he saw that there were very powerful nations which could harm his people and would have fought even longer and harder to protect his people. He also put a temporary king in place to do his will when he was out conquesting
ReplyDeleteThank you that cleared up my question :)
ReplyDelete